Normal RF vs Wi-Fi vs LoRa: Which Wireless Technology Is Best for a Nurse Call System?
Compare Normal RF, Wi-Fi, and LoRa for wireless nurse call systems. Learn why LoRa offers the best range, reliability, and scalability for hospitals
Choosing the Right Wireless Nurse Call System
Choosing the right wireless nurse call system is a critical decision for hospitals. While many products claim to be wireless, the underlying technology—Normal RF, Wi-Fi, or LoRa—determines reliability, scalability, and long-term performance.
Why Wireless Technology Matters in Nurse Call Systems
A nurse call system is a mission-critical hospital communication system. The wireless technology used must ensure:
- Reliable call delivery
- Multi-floor and hospital-wide coverage
- Low power consumption for battery-operated devices
- Easy scalability as the hospital grows
Normal RF-Based Nurse Call Systems ( 433Mhz)
Normal RF systems use basic proprietary radio communication.
Advantages
- Low initial cost
- Simple setup for small clinics
Limitations
- Short indoor range
- Poor wall and floor penetration
- Requires repeaters
- Limited scalability
Wi-Fi Based Nurse Call Systems
Wi-Fi-based systems operate on the hospital’s existing Wi-Fi network.
Advantages
- Easy integration with dashboards and apps
Limitations
- High power consumption
- Dependence on hospital IT infrastructure
- Risk of network congestion affecting alerts
LoRa-Based Nurse Call Systems
LoRa technology is designed for low-power, long-range, and reliable communication.
Advantages
- Hospital-wide and multi-floor coverage
- Excellent wall and floor penetration
- Battery life lasting several years
- Minimal infrastructure required
- High reliability and scalability
Final Recommendation
For hospitals seeking reliable communication, easy expansion, and low maintenance, LoRa is the best wireless technology for nurse call systems.
No comments yet. Login to start a new discussion Start a new discussion